NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro 575

Compare NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro 575, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1669 points
1752 points
4% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

42 FPS
Identical
42 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

25 FPS
4 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate
21 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

29 FPS
35 FPS
6 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

18 FPS
4 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
14 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro T2000 Max-Q and the Radeon Pro 575? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

428.20 points
87% significantly higher Blender score
228.12 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

40534 points
15% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
35081 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

34553 points
8% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
31842 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

40975 points
17% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
34762 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

27685 points
37847 points
36% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
256 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

112.1 GB/s
217 GB/s
93% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

40 W
274% significantly lower TDP
150 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

51.84 Gigapixels/s
47% significantly higher pixel rate
35.07 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

103.7 Gigatexels/s
140.3 Gigatexels/s
35% slightly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

3.32 TFLOPS
4.49 TFLOPS
35% slightly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024
2048
100% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

64
128
100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
Identical
32

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

229th of 592
224th of 592

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 May
2017 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro 575 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Radeon Pro 575 GPU is faster than the Quadro T2000 Max-Q in gaming.

In addition, the Quadro T2000 Max-Q has a significantly lower TDP at 40 W when compared to the Radeon Pro 575 at 150 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Radeon Pro 575 is better than the Quadro T2000 Max-Q.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons