NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs Intel Arc A380

Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 8 GB vs Intel Arc A380, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Intel Arc A380

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 336.70

$ 109.99

$ 226.71 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

4988 points

63% significantly better overall score

3050 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

115 FPS

51 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

65 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

66 FPS

18 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

47 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

78 FPS

31 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

47 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

50 FPS

20 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

29 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro RTX 4000 and the Arc A380? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

7843 points

873% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score

806 points

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

2173.35 points

371% significantly higher Blender score

461.06 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

84977 points

121% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

38350 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

79052 points

115% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

36712 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1005 MHz

235% significantly higher core clock speed

300 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1545 MHz

2000 MHz

29% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

166% significantly larger memory bus width

96 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

416 GB/s

123% significantly higher memory bandwidth

186 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

160 W

75 W

113% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

98.88 Gigapixels/s

54% significantly higher pixel rate

64 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

222.5 Gigatexels/s

73% significantly higher texture rate

128 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

7.12 TFLOPS

73% significantly better floating point performance

4.10 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

2304

125% significantly more shading units

1024

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

144

125% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

102nd of 597

153rd of 597

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2018 November

2022 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

Quadro RTX 4000 vs Arc A380 benchmarks

For gaming, the Quadro RTX 4000 graphics card is better than the Arc A380 in our tests.

In our comparison, the Quadro RTX 4000 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. Despite this, the Arc A380 has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the Arc A380 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Quadro RTX 4000 at 160 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro RTX 4000 over the Arc A380.