NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs Intel Arc A350M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 8 GB vs Intel Arc A350M, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

4933 points

171% significantly better overall score

1817 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

114 FPS

68 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

47 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

65 FPS

33 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

32 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

78 FPS

47 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

31 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

49 FPS

28 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

21 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro RTX 4000 and the Arc A350M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

2173.35 points

475% significantly higher Blender score

377.40 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

85184 points

268% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

23107 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

84977 points

241% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

24875 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

79052 points

219% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

24781 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1005 MHz

235% significantly higher core clock speed

300 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1545 MHz

34% slightly higher boost clock speed

1150 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

300% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

416 GB/s

271% significantly higher memory bandwidth

112 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

160 W

25 W

540% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

98.88 Gigapixels/s

258% significantly higher pixel rate

27.6 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

222.5 Gigatexels/s

303% significantly higher texture rate

55.2 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

7.12 TFLOPS

303% significantly better floating point performance

1.77 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

2304

200% significantly more shading units

768

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

144

200% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

166% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

103rd of 586

220th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2018 November

2022 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

Quadro RTX 4000 vs Arc A350M benchmarks

For gaming, the Arc A350M graphics card is better than the Quadro RTX 4000 in our tests.

In our comparison, the Quadro RTX 4000 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the Quadro RTX 4000 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the Arc A350M has a significantly lower TDP at 25 W when compared to the Quadro RTX 4000 at 160 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Arc A350M is better than the Quadro RTX 4000.