NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

Compare NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3440 points

3560 points

3% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

76 FPS

77 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

52 FPS

5 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

47 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

48 FPS

60 FPS

12 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

44 FPS

7 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

37 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro P4200 Max-Q and the CMP 30HX? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

458.13 points

764.87 points

66% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

42672 points

64325 points

50% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1215 MHz

1530 MHz

25% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1480 MHz

1785 MHz

20% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

33% slightly larger memory bus width

192 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

224.4 GB/s

336 GB/s

49% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

100 W

25% slightly lower TDP

125 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

94.72 Gigapixels/s

10% slightly higher pixel rate

85.68 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

213.1 Gigatexels/s

35% slightly higher texture rate

157.1 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

2304

63% significantly more shading units

1408

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

144

63% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

33% slightly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

140th of 586

136th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2018 February

2021 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

Quadro P4200 Max-Q vs CMP 30HX benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the CMP 30HX beats the Quadro P4200 Max-Q in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the CMP 30HX has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the CMP 30HX also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the Quadro P4200 Max-Q has a slightly lower TDP at 100 W when compared to the CMP 30HX at 125 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the CMP 30HX over the Quadro P4200 Max-Q.