NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2485 points
288% significantly better overall score
640 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS
39 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
14 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

41 FPS
31 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
10 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

32 FPS
23 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
10 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

32 FPS
24 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
8 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro P4000 and the GeForce MX250? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

4880 points
369% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score
1039 points
Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

464.31 points
417% significantly higher Blender score
89.74 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

39254 points
303% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
9734 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

42289 points
314% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
10197 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

41279 points
315% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
9939 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

42289 points
353% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
9326 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

41581 points
353% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
9178 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1227 MHz
30% slightly higher core clock speed
937 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1480 MHz
42% slightly higher boost clock speed
1038 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit
300% significantly larger memory bus width
64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

243.3 GB/s
406% significantly higher memory bandwidth
48.06 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

105 W
10 W
950% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

94.72 Gigapixels/s
470% significantly higher pixel rate
16.61 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

165.8 Gigatexels/s
565% significantly higher texture rate
24.91 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1792
366% significantly more shading units
384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

112
366% significantly more texture mapping units
24

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

64
300% significantly more render output processors
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

181st of 604
314th of 604

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 February
2019 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.1
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.6

Popular GPU Comparisons