NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 180.00

$ 134.75

$ 45.25 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1483 points

18% slightly better overall score

1252 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

32 FPS

5 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

27 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

23 FPS

4 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

19 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

22 FPS

5 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

17 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

18 FPS

3 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

15 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro P2000 and the Quadro M4000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

2953 points

28% slightly higher 3DMark Graphics score

2302 points

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

225.21 points

1% slightly higher Blender score

221.61 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

21668 points

30% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

16648 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

23869 points

29% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

18372 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

23151 points

10% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

20969 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

22747 points

13% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

20001 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

23501 points

23838 points

1% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1076 MHz

34% slightly higher core clock speed

800 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

160 Bit

256 Bit

60% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

140.2 GB/s

192.3 GB/s

37% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

60% significantly lower TDP

120 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

59.2 Gigapixels/s

19% slightly higher pixel rate

49.47 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

94.72 Gigatexels/s

17% slightly higher texture rate

80.39 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

3.03 TFLOPS

17% slightly better floating point performance

2.57 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

1664

62% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

104

62% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

60% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

234th of 586

247th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 February

2015 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

12.4

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

Quadro P2000 vs Quadro M4000 specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Quadro P2000 beats the Quadro M4000 in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the Quadro P2000 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

In addition, the Quadro P2000 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Quadro M4000 at 120 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro P2000 over the Quadro M4000.