NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 180.00

$ 39.90

$ 140.10 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1483 points

233% significantly better overall score

445 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

32 FPS

22 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

10 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

23 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

8 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

22 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

8 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

18 FPS

12 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

7 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro P2000 and the Quadro M1000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

225.21 points

128% significantly higher Blender score

98.53 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

21668 points

155% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

8471 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

23869 points

167% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

8927 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

23151 points

196% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

7809 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

22747 points

157% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

8849 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

23501 points

191% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

8061 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1076 MHz

8% slightly higher core clock speed

993 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

160 Bit

25% slightly larger memory bus width

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

140.2 GB/s

74% significantly higher memory bandwidth

80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

40 W

87% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

59.2 Gigapixels/s

272% significantly higher pixel rate

15.89 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

94.72 Gigatexels/s

198% significantly higher texture rate

31.78 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

100% significantly more shading units

512

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

150% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

234th of 586

345th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 February

2015 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

Quadro P2000 vs Quadro M1000M specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro P2000 GPU is faster than the Quadro M1000M in gaming.

Our database shows that the Quadro P2000 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

In addition, the Quadro M1000M has a significantly lower TDP at 40 W when compared to the Quadro P2000 at 75 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro P2000 is faster than the Quadro M1000M.