NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K620

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 180.00

$ 70.99

$ 109.01 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1483 points

384% significantly better overall score

306 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

32 FPS

26 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

7 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

23 FPS

18 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

5 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

22 FPS

18 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

18 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

4 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro P2000 and the Quadro K620? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

225.21 points

287% significantly higher Blender score

58.07 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

21668 points

225% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

6653 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

23869 points

247% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

6869 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

23151 points

252% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

6567 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

22747 points

239% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

6697 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

23501 points

299% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

5877 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1076 MHz

7% slightly higher core clock speed

1000 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1480 MHz

31% slightly higher boost clock speed

1124 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

160 Bit

25% slightly larger memory bus width

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

140.2 GB/s

386% significantly higher memory bandwidth

28.8 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

45 W

66% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

59.2 Gigapixels/s

229% significantly higher pixel rate

17.98 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

94.72 Gigatexels/s

251% significantly higher texture rate

26.98 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

166% significantly more shading units

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

166% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

150% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

234th of 586

376th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 February

2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

Quadro P2000 vs Quadro K620 specs and performance

For gaming, the Quadro P2000 graphics card is better than the Quadro K620 in our tests.

The Quadro P2000 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the Quadro P2000 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the Quadro K620 has a significantly lower TDP at 45 W when compared to the Quadro P2000 at 75 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro P2000 is faster than the Quadro K620.