NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 180.00

$ 8.02 slightly less expensive

$ 188.02

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1483 points

290% significantly better overall score

380 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

32 FPS

23 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

9 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

23 FPS

18 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

5 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

22 FPS

16 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

6 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

18 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

4 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro P2000 and the Quadro K4100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

225.21 points

86% significantly higher Blender score

120.97 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

21668 points

217% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

6821 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

23869 points

357% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

5215 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

23151 points

228% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

7058 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

22747 points

152% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

9002 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1076 MHz

52% significantly higher core clock speed

706 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

160 Bit

256 Bit

60% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

140.2 GB/s

36% slightly higher memory bandwidth

102.4 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

33% slightly lower TDP

100 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

59.2 Gigapixels/s

249% significantly higher pixel rate

16.94 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

94.72 Gigatexels/s

39% slightly higher texture rate

67.78 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

3.03 TFLOPS

86% significantly better floating point performance

1.63 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

1152

12% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

49% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

25% slightly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

234th of 586

357th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 February

2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

Quadro P2000 vs Quadro K4100M comparison

In our benchmarks, the Quadro P2000 beats the Quadro K4100M in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Quadro P2000 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

In addition, the Quadro P2000 has a slightly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Quadro K4100M at 100 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro P2000 is better than the Quadro K4100M.