NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 180.00

$ 2794.00 significantly less expensive

$ 2974.00

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1483 points

433% significantly better overall score

278 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

32 FPS

26 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

23 FPS

19 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

3 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

22 FPS

18 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

18 FPS

15 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro P2000 and the Quadro K3100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

225.21 points

167% significantly higher Blender score

84.13 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

21668 points

425% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

4121 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

23869 points

578% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

3517 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

23151 points

398% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

4645 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

22747 points

264% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

6238 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

23501 points

593% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

3389 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1076 MHz

58% significantly higher core clock speed

680 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

160 Bit

256 Bit

60% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

140.2 GB/s

36% slightly higher memory bandwidth

102.4 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

Identical

75 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

59.2 Gigapixels/s

423% significantly higher pixel rate

11.3 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

94.72 Gigatexels/s

109% significantly higher texture rate

45.18 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

33% slightly more shading units

768

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

Identical

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

25% slightly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

234th of 586

387th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 February

2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

Quadro P2000 vs Quadro K3100M benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the Quadro P2000 beats the Quadro K3100M in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Quadro P2000 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

In addition, both the Quadro P2000 and the Quadro K3100M have an identical TDP. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro P2000 is faster than the Quadro K3100M.