NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050

Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 180.00
$ 49.99 slightly less expensive
$ 229.99

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1483 points
3468 points
133% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

32 FPS
82 FPS
50 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

23 FPS
41 FPS
18 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

22 FPS
59 FPS
37 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

18 FPS
31 FPS
13 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro P2000 and the GeForce RTX 3050? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

2953 points
6224 points
110% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score
Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

225.21 points
1484.67 points
559% significantly higher Blender score
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

21668 points
72998 points
236% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

23869 points
71667 points
200% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

23151 points
56109 points
142% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

22747 points
63483 points
179% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

23501 points
62406 points
165% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1076 MHz
1552 MHz
44% significantly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1480 MHz
1777 MHz
20% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

160 Bit
25% slightly larger memory bus width
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

140.2 GB/s
224 GB/s
59% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W
73% significantly lower TDP
130 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

59.2 Gigapixels/s
4% slightly higher pixel rate
56.86 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

94.72 Gigatexels/s
142.2 Gigatexels/s
50% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

3.03 TFLOPS
9.10 TFLOPS
200% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024
2560
150% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

64
80
25% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

40
25% slightly more render output processors
32

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

234th of 586
139th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 February
2022 January

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

Quadro P2000 vs GeForce RTX 3050 benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce RTX 3050 GPU is faster than the Quadro P2000 in gaming.

Our database shows that the GeForce RTX 3050 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce RTX 3050 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the Quadro P2000 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 at 130 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce RTX 3050 is faster than the Quadro P2000.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons