NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs Intel Arc A380

Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs Intel Arc A380, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Intel Arc A380

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 180.00

$ 109.99

$ 70.01 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1483 points

3050 points

105% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

32 FPS

65 FPS

32 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

23 FPS

47 FPS

25 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

22 FPS

47 FPS

26 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

18 FPS

29 FPS

11 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro P2000 and the Arc A380? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

2953 points

266% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score

806 points

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

225.21 points

461.06 points

104% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

22747 points

38350 points

68% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

23501 points

36712 points

56% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1076 MHz

258% significantly higher core clock speed

300 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1480 MHz

2000 MHz

35% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

160 Bit

66% significantly larger memory bus width

96 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

140.2 GB/s

186 GB/s

32% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

Identical

75 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

59.2 Gigapixels/s

64 Gigapixels/s

8% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

94.72 Gigatexels/s

128 Gigatexels/s

35% slightly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

3.03 TFLOPS

4.10 TFLOPS

35% slightly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

Identical

1024

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

Identical

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

25% slightly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

234th of 586

153rd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 February

2022 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

Quadro P2000 vs Arc A380 benchmarks

For gaming, the Arc A380 graphics card is better than the Quadro P2000 in our tests.

In our comparison, the Quadro P2000 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. Despite this, the Arc A380 has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, both the Quadro P2000 and the Arc A380 have an identical TDP. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Arc A380 is faster than the Quadro P2000.