NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

Compare NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro P600

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 399.95

$ 60.00

$ 339.95 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1094 points

63% significantly better overall score

668 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

25 FPS

10 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

15 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

16 FPS

6 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

10 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

15 FPS

6 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

10 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

14 FPS

6 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

8 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro M3000M and the Quadro P600? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

269.47 points

139% significantly higher Blender score

112.43 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

15678 points

47% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

10634 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

17348 points

55% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

11181 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

17520 points

69% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

10334 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

16504 points

47% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

11181 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

16744 points

71% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

9764 points

Specifications

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

100% significantly more memory

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

160.4 GB/s

150% significantly higher memory bandwidth

64.13 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

40 W

87% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

33.6 Gigapixels/s

34% slightly higher pixel rate

24.91 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

67.2 Gigatexels/s

79% significantly higher texture rate

37.37 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

166% significantly more shading units

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

166% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

257th of 586

296th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 August

2017 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.1

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro M3000M vs Quadro P600 benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the Quadro M3000M beats the Quadro P600 in gaming performance.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Quadro M3000M has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro P600 has a significantly lower TDP at 40 W when compared to the Quadro M3000M at 75 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro M3000M is faster than the Quadro P600.