NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1094 points
337% significantly better overall score
250 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

25 FPS
19 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

16 FPS
13 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
3 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

15 FPS
12 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

14 FPS
11 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro M3000M and the GeForce 920M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

269.47 points
469% significantly higher Blender score
47.35 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

15678 points
466% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
2766 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

17348 points
401% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
3462 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

17520 points
444% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
3215 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

16504 points
343% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
3725 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

16744 points
335% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
3845 points

Specifications

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit
300% significantly larger memory bus width
64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

160.4 GB/s
1013% significantly higher memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W
33 W
127% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

33.6 Gigapixels/s
340% significantly higher pixel rate
7.63 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

67.2 Gigatexels/s
120% significantly higher texture rate
30.53 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024
166% significantly more shading units
384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

64
100% significantly more texture mapping units
32

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
300% significantly more render output processors
8

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

257th of 586
398th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 August
2015 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.1
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.6

Quadro M3000M vs GeForce 920M comparison

In our benchmarks, the Quadro M3000M beats the GeForce 920M in gaming performance.

In addition, the GeForce 920M has a significantly lower TDP at 33 W when compared to the Quadro M3000M at 75 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro M3000M is better than the GeForce 920M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons