NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

Compare NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 199.95
$ 60.00
$ 139.95 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

501 points
668 points
33% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

11 FPS
15 FPS
4 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

9 FPS
10 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

9 FPS
10 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

8 FPS
Identical
8 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro M2000M and the Quadro P600? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

131.34 points
16% slightly higher Blender score
112.43 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

11041 points
3% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
10634 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

10557 points
11181 points
5% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

10308 points
10334 points
0.25% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

10116 points
11181 points
10% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

9696 points
9764 points
0.70% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1029 MHz
1354 MHz
31% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1098 MHz
1557 MHz
41% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
100% significantly more memory
2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
Identical
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80.19 GB/s
25% slightly higher memory bandwidth
64.13 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

55 W
40 W
37% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

17.57 Gigapixels/s
24.91 Gigapixels/s
41% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

43.92 Gigatexels/s
17% slightly higher texture rate
37.37 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

640
66% significantly more shading units
384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

40
66% significantly more texture mapping units
24

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

16
Identical
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

328th of 586
296th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 December
2017 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.1
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.5

Quadro M2000M vs Quadro P600 benchmarks

For gaming, the Quadro P600 graphics card is better than the Quadro M2000M in our tests.

The Quadro P600 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the Quadro P600 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Quadro M2000M has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro P600 has a slightly lower TDP at 40 W when compared to the Quadro M2000M at 55 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro P600 is faster than the Quadro M2000M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons