NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 199.95

$ 200.00 significantly less expensive

$ 399.95

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

501 points

1094 points

118% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

11 FPS

25 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

9 FPS

16 FPS

7 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

9 FPS

15 FPS

7 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

8 FPS

14 FPS

6 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro M2000M and the Quadro M3000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

131.34 points

269.47 points

105% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

11041 points

15678 points

41% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

10557 points

17348 points

64% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

10308 points

17520 points

69% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

10116 points

16504 points

63% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

9696 points

16744 points

72% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80.19 GB/s

160.4 GB/s

100% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

55 W

36% slightly lower TDP

75 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

17.57 Gigapixels/s

33.6 Gigapixels/s

91% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

43.92 Gigatexels/s

67.2 Gigatexels/s

53% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

640

1024

60% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

60% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

328th of 586

257th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 December

2015 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro M2000M vs Quadro M3000M specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro M3000M GPU is faster than the Quadro M2000M in gaming.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro M2000M has a slightly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the Quadro M3000M at 75 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro M3000M over the Quadro M2000M.