NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs AMD Radeon R9 370X

Compare NVIDIA Quadro M2000 4 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 370X, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

974 points

2% slightly better overall score

946 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

21 FPS

22 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

14 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

14 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

14 FPS

19 FPS

5 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

12 FPS

5 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

7 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro M2000 and the Radeon R9 370X? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

14584 points

25893 points

77% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1180 MHz

20% slightly higher core clock speed

980 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1163 MHz

12% slightly higher boost clock speed

1030 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

105.8 GB/s

179.2 GB/s

69% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

139% significantly lower TDP

180 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

37.22 Gigapixels/s

12% slightly higher pixel rate

32.96 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

55.82 Gigatexels/s

82.4 Gigatexels/s

47% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

1.79 TFLOPS

2.64 TFLOPS

47% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

768

1280

66% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

66% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

266th of 586

268th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 April

2015 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.1

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.6

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R9 370X benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Radeon R9 370X GPU is faster than the Quadro M2000 in gaming.

The Quadro M2000 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the Quadro M2000 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the Quadro M2000 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Radeon R9 370X at 180 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Radeon R9 370X is better than the Quadro M2000.