NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro M1000M 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 39.90
$ 160.05 significantly less expensive
$ 199.95

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

445 points
501 points
12% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

10 FPS
11 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

8 FPS
9 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

8 FPS
9 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

7 FPS
8 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro M1000M and the Quadro M2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

98.53 points
131.34 points
33% slightly higher Blender score
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

8471 points
11041 points
30% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

8927 points
10557 points
18% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

7809 points
10308 points
32% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

8849 points
10116 points
14% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

8061 points
9696 points
20% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

993 MHz
1029 MHz
3% slightly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
Identical
4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
Identical
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80.19 GB/s
Identical
80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

40 W
37% slightly lower TDP
55 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

15.89 Gigapixels/s
17.57 Gigapixels/s
10% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

31.78 Gigatexels/s
43.92 Gigatexels/s
38% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

512
640
25% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

32
40
25% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

16
Identical
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

342nd of 586
328th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 August
2015 December

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.1
12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.5

Quadro M1000M vs Quadro M2000M comparison

For gaming, the Quadro M2000M graphics card is better than the Quadro M1000M in our tests.

The Quadro M2000M has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro M1000M has a slightly lower TDP at 40 W when compared to the Quadro M2000M at 55 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro M2000M is better than the Quadro M1000M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons