NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K620 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 70.99

$ 54.01 significantly less expensive

$ 125.00

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

306 points

974 points

218% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

7 FPS

21 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

5 FPS

14 FPS

10 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS

14 FPS

11 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

4 FPS

12 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K620 and the Quadro M2000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

58.07 points

135.49 points

133% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

6653 points

13100 points

96% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6869 points

14953 points

117% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

6567 points

15367 points

134% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6697 points

14584 points

117% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

5877 points

14502 points

146% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1000 MHz

1180 MHz

18% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1124 MHz

1163 MHz

3% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB

4 GiB

100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

28.8 GB/s

105.8 GB/s

267% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

45 W

66% significantly lower TDP

75 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

17.98 Gigapixels/s

37.22 Gigapixels/s

107% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

26.98 Gigatexels/s

55.82 Gigatexels/s

106% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

768

100% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

376th of 586

265th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 July

2016 April

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K620 vs Quadro M2000 specs and performance

For gaming, the Quadro M2000 graphics card is better than the Quadro K620 in our tests.

The Quadro M2000 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the Quadro M2000 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Quadro M2000 has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro K620 has a significantly lower TDP at 45 W when compared to the Quadro M2000 at 75 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro M2000 is faster than the Quadro K620.