NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K600 1 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K620 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K620

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 82.77

$ 70.99

$ 11.78 slightly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

65 points

306 points

370% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

2 FPS

7 FPS

4 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

1 FPS

5 FPS

4 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

1 FPS

4 FPS

3 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

0 FPS

4 FPS

3 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K600 and the Quadro K620? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

13.85 points

58.07 points

319% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

1356 points

6653 points

390% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

1572 points

6869 points

336% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

1753 points

6567 points

274% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

1810 points

6697 points

269% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

1928 points

5877 points

204% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

876 MHz

1000 MHz

14% slightly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

1 GiB

2 GiB

100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

28.51 GB/s

28.8 GB/s

1% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

41 W

9% slightly lower TDP

45 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

3.50 Gigapixels/s

17.98 Gigapixels/s

413% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

14.02 Gigatexels/s

26.98 Gigatexels/s

92% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

192

384

100% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

49% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

537th of 586

376th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 March

2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K600 vs Quadro K620 benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro K620 GPU is faster than the Quadro K600 in gaming.

Our database shows that the Quadro K620 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Quadro K620 has significantly more memory with 2 GiB of memory compared to 1 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro K600 has a slightly lower TDP at 41 W when compared to the Quadro K620 at 45 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro K620 over the Quadro K600.