NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 170.10

$ 107.00

$ 63.10 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2513 points

194% significantly better overall score

853 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

62 FPS

42 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

19 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

36 FPS

23 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

13 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

41 FPS

27 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

13 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

31 FPS

21 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

10 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K5200 and the Quadro P1000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

281.16 points

116% significantly higher Blender score

129.75 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

13735 points

14286 points

4% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

16029 points

2% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

15667 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

17881 points

24% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

14310 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

19104 points

31% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

14517 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

20167 points

49% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

13469 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

650 MHz

1354 MHz

108% significantly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

771 MHz

1480 MHz

91% significantly higher boost clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

8 GiB

100% significantly more memory

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

192.3 GB/s

139% significantly higher memory bandwidth

80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

150 W

47 W

219% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

37.01 Gigapixels/s

47.36 Gigapixels/s

27% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

148 Gigatexels/s

150% significantly higher texture rate

59.2 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

3.55 TFLOPS

87% significantly better floating point performance

1.89 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

2304

259% significantly more shading units

640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

192

380% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

49% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

178th of 599

281st of 599

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 July

2017 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K5200 vs Quadro P1000 specs and performance

For gaming, the Quadro K5200 graphics card is better than the Quadro P1000 in our tests.

In our comparison, the Quadro P1000 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the Quadro P1000 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Quadro K5200 has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro P1000 has a significantly lower TDP at 47 W when compared to the Quadro K5200 at 150 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro K5200 is faster than the Quadro P1000.