NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 170.10

$ 229.85 significantly less expensive

$ 399.95

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2513 points

129% significantly better overall score

1094 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

62 FPS

37 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

25 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

36 FPS

19 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

16 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

41 FPS

25 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

15 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

31 FPS

17 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

14 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K5200 and the Quadro M3000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

281.16 points

4% slightly higher Blender score

269.47 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

13735 points

15678 points

14% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

16029 points

17348 points

8% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

17881 points

2% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

17520 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

19104 points

15% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

16504 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

20167 points

20% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

16744 points

Specifications

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

8 GiB

100% significantly more memory

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

Identical

256 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

192.3 GB/s

19% slightly higher memory bandwidth

160.4 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

150 W

75 W

100% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

37.01 Gigapixels/s

10% slightly higher pixel rate

33.6 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

148 Gigatexels/s

120% significantly higher texture rate

67.2 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

3.55 TFLOPS

65% significantly better floating point performance

2.15 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

2304

125% significantly more shading units

1024

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

192

200% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

49% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

176th of 586

257th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 July

2015 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K5200 vs Quadro M3000M specs and performance

For gaming, the Quadro K5200 graphics card is better than the Quadro M3000M in our tests.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Quadro K5200 has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro M3000M has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Quadro K5200 at 150 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro K5200 over the Quadro M3000M.