NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 329.95

$ 199.95

$ 130.00 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

510 points

1% slightly better overall score

501 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

12 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

11 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

7 FPS

9 FPS

2 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

8 FPS

9 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

7 FPS

8 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K5000M and the Quadro M2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5107 points

10557 points

106% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5107 points

10116 points

98% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

706 MHz

1029 MHz

45% significantly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

96 GB/s

19% slightly higher memory bandwidth

80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

100 W

55 W

81% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

16.83 Gigapixels/s

17.57 Gigapixels/s

4% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

67.31 Gigatexels/s

53% significantly higher texture rate

43.92 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1344

110% significantly more shading units

640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

112

180% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

325th of 586

328th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 December

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K5000M vs Quadro M2000M benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the Quadro K5000M beats the Quadro M2000M in gaming performance.

The Quadro M2000M has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro M2000M has a significantly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the Quadro K5000M at 100 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro K5000M over the Quadro M2000M.