NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA T1000 8GB

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

899 points
1993 points
121% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

20 FPS
48 FPS
28 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

13 FPS
26 FPS
13 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

14 FPS
32 FPS
18 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS
20 FPS
10 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K4200 and the T1000 8GB? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

170.14 points
438.31 points
157% significantly higher Blender score
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

8973 points
38577 points
329% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11745 points
37882 points
222% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

12321 points
38005 points
208% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

12444 points
34502 points
177% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

780 MHz
1065 MHz
36% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

784 MHz
1395 MHz
77% significantly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

172.8 GB/s
8% slightly higher memory bandwidth
160 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

105 W
50 W
110% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

21.95 Gigapixels/s
44.64 Gigapixels/s
103% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

87.81 Gigatexels/s
12% slightly higher texture rate
78.12 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.11 TFLOPS
2.5 TFLOPS
18% slightly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1344
49% significantly more shading units
896

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

112
100% significantly more texture mapping units
56

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
Identical
32

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

281st of 604
213th of 604

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 July
2021 May

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.6

Popular GPU Comparisons