NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA T1000

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K4200 4 GB vs NVIDIA T1000, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA T1000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 149.46

$ 190.54 significantly less expensive

$ 340.00

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

899 points

1929 points

114% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

20 FPS

45 FPS

26 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

13 FPS

26 FPS

13 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

14 FPS

30 FPS

17 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS

19 FPS

9 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K4200 and the T1000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

170.14 points

396.07 points

132% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

8973 points

37817 points

321% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11745 points

36847 points

213% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

11396 points

34096 points

199% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

12321 points

37775 points

206% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

12444 points

34830 points

179% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

780 MHz

1065 MHz

36% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

784 MHz

1395 MHz

77% significantly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

172.8 GB/s

8% slightly higher memory bandwidth

160 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

105 W

50 W

110% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

21.95 Gigapixels/s

44.64 Gigapixels/s

103% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

87.81 Gigatexels/s

12% slightly higher texture rate

78.12 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.11 TFLOPS

2.5 TFLOPS

18% slightly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1344

49% significantly more shading units

896

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

112

100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

271st of 586

214th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 July

2021 May

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.6

Quadro K4200 vs T1000 benchmarks

For gaming, the T1000 graphics card is better than the Quadro K4200 in our tests.

Our database shows that the T1000 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the T1000 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the T1000 has a significantly lower TDP at 50 W when compared to the Quadro K4200 at 105 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the T1000 over the Quadro K4200.