NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K4200 4 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A2000, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA RTX A2000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 149.46

$ 375.50 significantly less expensive

$ 524.96

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

899 points

3755 points

317% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

20 FPS

96 FPS

76 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

13 FPS

45 FPS

33 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

14 FPS

64 FPS

51 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS

35 FPS

25 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K4200 and the RTX A2000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

170.14 points

1954.21 points

1048% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

8973 points

84002 points

836% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11745 points

76373 points

550% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

11396 points

58378 points

412% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

12321 points

73300 points

494% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

12444 points

69543 points

458% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

780 MHz

38% slightly higher core clock speed

562 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

784 MHz

1200 MHz

53% significantly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

33% slightly larger memory bus width

192 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

172.8 GB/s

288 GB/s

66% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

105 W

70 W

49% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

21.95 Gigapixels/s

57.6 Gigapixels/s

162% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

87.81 Gigatexels/s

124.8 Gigatexels/s

42% slightly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.11 TFLOPS

7.99 TFLOPS

279% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1344

3328

147% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

112

7% slightly more texture mapping units

104

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

49% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

271st of 586

130th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 July

2021 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.6

Quadro K4200 vs RTX A2000 benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the RTX A2000 GPU is faster than the Quadro K4200 in gaming.

Our database shows that the Quadro K4200 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. Despite this, the RTX A2000 has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the RTX A2000 has a significantly lower TDP at 70 W when compared to the Quadro K4200 at 105 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the RTX A2000 over the Quadro K4200.