NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P620 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro P620

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 188.02

$ 70.00

$ 118.02 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

380 points

788 points

107% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

9 FPS

17 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

5 FPS

12 FPS

7 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

6 FPS

13 FPS

7 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

4 FPS

10 FPS

5 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K4100M and the Quadro P620? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

120.97 points

1% slightly higher Blender score

119.66 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

6821 points

11727 points

71% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5215 points

12475 points

139% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

7058 points

11923 points

68% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

9002 points

12054 points

33% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

706 MHz

1266 MHz

79% significantly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

100% significantly more memory

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

102.4 GB/s

27% slightly higher memory bandwidth

80.13 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

100 W

40 W

150% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

16.94 Gigapixels/s

21.66 Gigapixels/s

27% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

67.78 Gigatexels/s

56% significantly higher texture rate

43.33 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1152

125% significantly more shading units

512

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

200% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

357th of 586

282nd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 July

2018 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K4100M vs Quadro P620 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro P620 GPU is faster than the Quadro K4100M in gaming.

The Quadro P620 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Quadro K4100M has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro P620 has a significantly lower TDP at 40 W when compared to the Quadro K4100M at 100 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro P620 is faster than the Quadro K4100M.