NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K4000 3 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 135.15

$ 264.80 significantly less expensive

$ 399.95

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

427 points

1094 points

156% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

11 FPS

25 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

6 FPS

16 FPS

10 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

68 FPS

53 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

15 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

5 FPS

14 FPS

9 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K4000 and the Quadro M3000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

95.18 points

269.47 points

183% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

5210 points

15678 points

200% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6816 points

17348 points

154% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

6504 points

17520 points

169% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6816 points

16504 points

142% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

6876 points

16744 points

143% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

3 GiB

4 GiB

33% slightly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit

256 Bit

33% slightly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

134.8 GB/s

160.4 GB/s

18% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

80 W

75 W

6% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

12.96 Gigapixels/s

33.6 Gigapixels/s

159% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

51.84 Gigatexels/s

67.2 Gigatexels/s

29% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

768

1024

33% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

Identical

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

33% slightly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

350th of 586

257th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 March

2015 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K4000 vs Quadro M3000M specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro M3000M GPU is faster than the Quadro K4000 in gaming.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Quadro M3000M has slightly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 3 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Quadro M3000M has a slightly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Quadro K4000 at 80 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro M3000M over the Quadro K4000.