NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K4000 3 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 135.15

$ 64.80 significantly less expensive

$ 199.95

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

427 points

501 points

17% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

11 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

6 FPS

9 FPS

3 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

68 FPS

59 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

9 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

5 FPS

8 FPS

3 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K4000 and the Quadro M2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

95.18 points

131.34 points

37% slightly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

5210 points

11041 points

111% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6816 points

10557 points

54% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

6504 points

10308 points

58% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6816 points

10116 points

48% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

6876 points

9696 points

41% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

3 GiB

4 GiB

33% slightly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit

49% significantly larger memory bus width

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

134.8 GB/s

68% significantly higher memory bandwidth

80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

80 W

55 W

45% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

12.96 Gigapixels/s

17.57 Gigapixels/s

35% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

51.84 Gigatexels/s

18% slightly higher texture rate

43.92 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

768

20% slightly more shading units

640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

60% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

49% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

348th of 586

328th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 March

2015 December

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K4000 vs Quadro M2000M specs and performance

For gaming, the Quadro M2000M graphics card is better than the Quadro K4000 in our tests.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Quadro M2000M has slightly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 3 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro M2000M has a significantly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the Quadro K4000 at 80 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro M2000M over the Quadro K4000.