NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 4 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 2974.00
$ 119.99
$ 2854.01 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

278 points
445 points
60% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

6 FPS
11 FPS
4 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS
7 FPS
3 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS
10 FPS
6 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS
4 FPS
1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K3100M and the Radeon Pro WX 3200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3517 points
15640 points
344% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

4645 points
16510 points
255% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6238 points
14637 points
134% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3389 points
15582 points
359% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

680 MHz
1295 MHz
90% significantly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
Identical
4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

102.4 GB/s
6% slightly higher memory bandwidth
96 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W
65 W
15% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

11.3 Gigapixels/s
20.72 Gigapixels/s
83% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

45.18 Gigatexels/s
9% slightly higher texture rate
41.44 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

768
20% slightly more shading units
640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

64
100% significantly more texture mapping units
32

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
100% significantly more render output processors
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

389th of 586
343rd of 586

Family

The product line

-
Radeon PRO

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 July
2019 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.6

Quadro K3100M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 comparison

For gaming, the Radeon Pro WX 3200 graphics card is better than the Quadro K3100M in our tests.

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has a slightly lower TDP at 65 W when compared to the Quadro K3100M at 75 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Radeon Pro WX 3200 over the Quadro K3100M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons