Compare NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 4 GB vs AMD Radeon 520 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?
Quickly search and compare graphics cards
The cheapest price from our partner retailers
General gaming and workstation score
Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes
Randomly generated noise sphere test
Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering
Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test
Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K3100M and the Radeon 520? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.
OpenCL compute benchmark
Vulkan compute benchmark
OpenCL compute benchmark
Vulkan compute benchmark
Onboard memory size for textures and vertices
Number of parallel lines to the memory chips
Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory
Number of pixels that can be rendered per second
Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second
Number of processors dedicated to applying textures
Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering
Ranking in the hardwareDB database
The product line
The official date of release of this chip
The type of memory used by this chip
Maximum version of DirectX supported
Maximum version of OpenGL supported
For gaming, the Quadro K3100M graphics card is better than the Radeon 520 in our tests.
Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.
In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro K3100M over the Radeon 520.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.