NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 2974.00

$ 125.00

$ 2849.00 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

278 points

974 points

250% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

6 FPS

21 FPS

15 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS

14 FPS

11 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS

14 FPS

11 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS

12 FPS

9 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K3100M and the Quadro M2000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

84.13 points

135.49 points

61% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

4121 points

13100 points

217% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3517 points

14953 points

325% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

4645 points

15367 points

230% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6238 points

14584 points

133% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3389 points

14502 points

327% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

680 MHz

1180 MHz

73% significantly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

102.4 GB/s

105.8 GB/s

3% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

Identical

75 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

11.3 Gigapixels/s

37.22 Gigapixels/s

229% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

45.18 Gigatexels/s

55.82 Gigatexels/s

23% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

768

Identical

768

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

33% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

390th of 586

266th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 July

2016 April

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K3100M vs Quadro M2000 specs and performance

For gaming, the Quadro M2000 graphics card is better than the Quadro K3100M in our tests.

In our comparison, the Quadro M2000 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

As stated by the manufacturer, they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, both the Quadro K3100M and the Quadro M2000 have an identical TDP. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro M2000 over the Quadro K3100M.