NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2200 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 120.11

$ 14.64 slightly less expensive

$ 134.75

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

695 points

1252 points

80% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

13 FPS

27 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

11 FPS

19 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

10 FPS

17 FPS

7 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS

15 FPS

6 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2200 and the Quadro M4000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

125.93 points

221.61 points

75% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

11549 points

16648 points

44% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

12020 points

18372 points

52% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

11238 points

20969 points

86% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11456 points

20001 points

74% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

10094 points

23838 points

136% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1000 MHz

25% slightly higher core clock speed

800 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

8 GiB

100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80.19 GB/s

192.3 GB/s

139% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

68 W

76% significantly lower TDP

120 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

17.98 Gigapixels/s

49.47 Gigapixels/s

175% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

44.96 Gigatexels/s

80.39 Gigatexels/s

78% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

640

1664

160% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

104

160% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

300% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

291st of 586

247th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 July

2015 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.4

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K2200 vs Quadro M4000 comparison

In our benchmarks, the Quadro M4000 beats the Quadro K2200 in gaming performance.

The Quadro K2200 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Quadro M4000 has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro K2200 has a significantly lower TDP at 68 W when compared to the Quadro M4000 at 120 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro M4000 is faster than the Quadro K2200.