NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2200 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K620 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 120.11
$ 70.99
$ 49.12 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

695 points
127% significantly better overall score
306 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

13 FPS
6 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
7 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

11 FPS
6 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
5 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

10 FPS
6 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS
6 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
4 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2200 and the Quadro K620? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

125.93 points
116% significantly higher Blender score
58.07 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

11549 points
73% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
6653 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

12020 points
74% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
6869 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

11238 points
71% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
6567 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11456 points
71% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
6697 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

10094 points
71% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
5877 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1000 MHz
Identical
1000 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1124 MHz
Identical
1124 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
100% significantly more memory
2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
Identical
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80.19 GB/s
178% significantly higher memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

68 W
45 W
51% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

17.98 Gigapixels/s
Identical
17.98 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

44.96 Gigatexels/s
66% significantly higher texture rate
26.98 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

640
66% significantly more shading units
384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

40
66% significantly more texture mapping units
24

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

16
Identical
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

291st of 586
376th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 July
2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.5

Quadro K2200 vs Quadro K620 benchmarks

For gaming, the Quadro K2200 graphics card is better than the Quadro K620 in our tests.

Our database shows that both the Quadro K2200 and Quadro K620 both have the same core clock speed.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Quadro K2200 has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro K620 has a significantly lower TDP at 45 W when compared to the Quadro K2200 at 68 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro K2200 over the Quadro K620.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons