NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2200 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 120.11

$ 209.84 significantly less expensive

$ 329.95

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

695 points

36% slightly better overall score

510 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

13 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

12 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

11 FPS

3 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

7 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

10 FPS

2 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

8 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS

3 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

7 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2200 and the Quadro K5000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

12020 points

135% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

5107 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11456 points

124% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

5107 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1000 MHz

41% slightly higher core clock speed

706 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80.19 GB/s

96 GB/s

19% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

68 W

47% significantly lower TDP

100 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

17.98 Gigapixels/s

6% slightly higher pixel rate

16.83 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

44.96 Gigatexels/s

67.31 Gigatexels/s

49% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

640

1344

110% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

112

180% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

291st of 586

326th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K2200 vs Quadro K5000M specs and performance

For gaming, the Quadro K2200 graphics card is better than the Quadro K5000M in our tests.

In our comparison, the Quadro K2200 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

As stated by the manufacturer, they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Quadro K2200 has a significantly lower TDP at 68 W when compared to the Quadro K5000M at 100 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro K2200 is faster than the Quadro K5000M.