NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2200 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 120.11

$ 2853.89 significantly less expensive

$ 2974.00

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

695 points

150% significantly better overall score

278 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

13 FPS

7 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

11 FPS

7 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

3 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

10 FPS

6 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS

7 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2200 and the Quadro K3100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

125.93 points

49% significantly higher Blender score

84.13 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

11549 points

180% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

4121 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

12020 points

241% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

3517 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

11238 points

141% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

4645 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11456 points

83% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

6238 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

10094 points

197% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

3389 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1000 MHz

47% significantly higher core clock speed

680 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80.19 GB/s

102.4 GB/s

27% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

68 W

10% slightly lower TDP

75 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

17.98 Gigapixels/s

59% significantly higher pixel rate

11.3 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

44.96 Gigatexels/s

45.18 Gigatexels/s

0.49% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

640

768

20% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

60% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

292nd of 586

388th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 July

2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K2200 vs Quadro K3100M benchmarks

For gaming, the Quadro K2200 graphics card is better than the Quadro K3100M in our tests.

In our comparison, the Quadro K2200 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Quadro K2200 has a slightly lower TDP at 68 W when compared to the Quadro K3100M at 75 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro K2200 is better than the Quadro K3100M.