NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2200 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

695 points

167% significantly better overall score

260 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

13 FPS

6 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

7 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

11 FPS

7 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

10 FPS

6 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS

7 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2200 and the GeForce GT 750M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

125.93 points

146% significantly higher Blender score

51.07 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

11549 points

270% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

3118 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

12020 points

513% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

1958 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

11238 points

190% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

3874 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11456 points

168% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

4272 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

10094 points

147% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

4078 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1000 MHz

6% slightly higher core clock speed

941 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1124 MHz

16% slightly higher boost clock speed

967 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80.19 GB/s

24% slightly higher memory bandwidth

64.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

68 W

50 W

36% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

17.98 Gigapixels/s

132% significantly higher pixel rate

7.74 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

44.96 Gigatexels/s

45% significantly higher texture rate

30.94 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

640

66% significantly more shading units

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

25% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

291st of 586

397th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.6

Quadro K2200 vs GeForce GT 750M benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the Quadro K2200 beats the GeForce GT 750M in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the Quadro K2200 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the Quadro K2200 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the GeForce GT 750M has a slightly lower TDP at 50 W when compared to the Quadro K2200 at 68 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro K2200 is better than the GeForce GT 750M.