NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs AMD Radeon R7 350

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 2 GB vs AMD Radeon R7 350, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

AMD Radeon R7 350

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 163.96

$ 39.98

$ 123.98 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

260 points

297 points

14% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

6 FPS

7 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

4 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS

6 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

2 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2000D and the Radeon R7 350? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3602 points

10951 points

204% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3916 points

9524 points

143% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

954 MHz

1000 MHz

4% slightly higher core clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

64 GB/s

72 GB/s

12% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

51 W

7% slightly lower TDP

55 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

7.63 Gigapixels/s

12.8 Gigapixels/s

67% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

30.53 Gigatexels/s

19% slightly higher texture rate

25.6 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

512

33% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

Identical

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

394th of 586

381st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 March

2016 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.6

Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R7 350 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Radeon R7 350 GPU is faster than the Quadro K2000D in gaming.

Our database shows that the Radeon R7 350 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

In addition, the Quadro K2000D has a slightly lower TDP at 51 W when compared to the Radeon R7 350 at 55 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Radeon R7 350 over the Quadro K2000D.