Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 2 GB vs AMD Radeon R5 340X, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?
Quickly search and compare graphics cards
General gaming and workstation score
Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes
Randomly generated noise sphere test
Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering
Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test
Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2000D and the Radeon R5 340X? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.
OpenCL compute benchmark
OpenCL compute benchmark
Number of parallel lines to the memory chips
Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory
Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU
Number of pixels that can be rendered per second
Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second
Number of processors dedicated to shader processing
Number of processors dedicated to applying textures
Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering
Ranking in the hardwareDB database
The official date of release of this chip
The type of memory used by this chip
Maximum version of DirectX supported
Maximum version of OpenGL supported
According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Radeon R5 340X GPU is faster than the Quadro K2000D in gaming.
In addition, the Quadro K2000D has a slightly lower TDP at 51 W when compared to the Radeon R5 340X at 65 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.
In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Radeon R5 340X is better than the Quadro K2000D.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.