NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P400 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro P400

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 163.96

$ 67.36

$ 96.60 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

260 points

343 points

31% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

6 FPS

7 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

4 FPS

5 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS

5 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS

4 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2000D and the Quadro P400? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3602 points

5692 points

58% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3916 points

5614 points

43% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

954 MHz

1070 MHz

12% slightly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB

Identical

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

64 GB/s

99% significantly higher memory bandwidth

32.06 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

51 W

30 W

69% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

7.63 Gigapixels/s

20.03 Gigapixels/s

162% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

30.53 Gigatexels/s

52% significantly higher texture rate

20.03 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

49% significantly more shading units

256

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

396th of 586

362nd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 March

2017 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K2000D vs Quadro P400 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro P400 GPU is faster than the Quadro K2000D in gaming.

Our database shows that the Quadro P400 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that they both have the same amount of memory at 2 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Quadro P400 has a significantly lower TDP at 30 W when compared to the Quadro K2000D at 51 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro P400 is faster than the Quadro K2000D.