NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 163.96

$ 686.03 significantly less expensive

$ 849.99

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

260 points

278 points

6% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

6 FPS

Identical

6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

4 FPS

Identical

4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS

Identical

3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2000D and the Quadro K2100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3602 points

13% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

3163 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3916 points

4627 points

18% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

954 MHz

45% significantly higher core clock speed

654 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB

Identical

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

64 GB/s

32% slightly higher memory bandwidth

48.13 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

51 W

7% slightly lower TDP

55 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

7.63 Gigapixels/s

8.00 Gigapixels/s

4% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

30.53 Gigatexels/s

32.02 Gigatexels/s

4% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

576

49% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

49% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

397th of 586

387th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 March

2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K2000D vs Quadro K2100M specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro K2100M GPU is faster than the Quadro K2000D in gaming.

Our database shows that the Quadro K2000D has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that they both have the same amount of memory at 2 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Quadro K2000D has a slightly lower TDP at 51 W when compared to the Quadro K2100M at 55 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro K2100M is faster than the Quadro K2000D.