Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2000 2 GB vs AMD Radeon R5 340X, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?
Quickly search and compare graphics cards
General gaming and workstation score
Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes
Randomly generated noise sphere test
Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering
Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test
Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2000 and the Radeon R5 340X? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.
OpenCL compute benchmark
Vulkan compute benchmark
OpenCL compute benchmark
Vulkan compute benchmark
Number of parallel lines to the memory chips
Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory
Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU
Number of pixels that can be rendered per second
Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second
Number of processors dedicated to shader processing
Number of processors dedicated to applying textures
Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering
Ranking in the hardwareDB database
The official date of release of this chip
The type of memory used by this chip
Maximum version of DirectX supported
Maximum version of OpenGL supported
In our benchmarks, the Quadro K2000 beats the Radeon R5 340X in gaming performance.
In addition, the Quadro K2000 has a slightly lower TDP at 51 W when compared to the Radeon R5 340X at 65 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.
In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro K2000 is better than the Radeon R5 340X.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.