NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2000 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P620 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro P620

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 136.96

$ 70.00

$ 66.96 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

250 points

788 points

215% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

6 FPS

17 FPS

12 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

4 FPS

12 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS

13 FPS

9 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS

10 FPS

7 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2000 and the Quadro P620? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

44.49 points

119.66 points

168% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

3055 points

11727 points

283% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4071 points

12475 points

206% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3710 points

11923 points

221% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4071 points

12054 points

196% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

4126 points

11114 points

169% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

954 MHz

1266 MHz

32% slightly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB

Identical

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

64 GB/s

80.13 GB/s

25% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

51 W

40 W

27% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

7.63 Gigapixels/s

21.66 Gigapixels/s

183% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

30.53 Gigatexels/s

43.33 Gigatexels/s

41% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

512

33% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

Identical

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

400th of 586

282nd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 March

2018 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K2000 vs Quadro P620 comparison

For gaming, the Quadro P620 graphics card is better than the Quadro K2000 in our tests.

Our database shows that the Quadro P620 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, they both have the same amount of memory at 2 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro P620 has a slightly lower TDP at 40 W when compared to the Quadro K2000 at 51 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro P620 is faster than the Quadro K2000.