NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2000 2 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

250 points

260 points

4% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

6 FPS

7 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

4 FPS

Identical

4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS

Identical

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS

Identical

3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2000 and the GeForce GT 750M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

44.49 points

51.07 points

14% slightly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

3055 points

3118 points

2% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

2044 points

Identical

2044 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4071 points

107% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

1958 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3710 points

3874 points

4% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

3713 points

63% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

2267 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4071 points

4272 points

4% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

4126 points

1% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

4078 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

954 MHz

1% slightly higher core clock speed

941 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

64 GB/s

64.19 GB/s

0.30% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

51 W

50 W

2% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

7.63 Gigapixels/s

7.74 Gigapixels/s

1% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

30.53 Gigatexels/s

30.94 Gigatexels/s

1% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

Identical

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

Identical

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

400th of 586

395th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.6

Quadro K2000 vs GeForce GT 750M comparison

For gaming, the GeForce GT 750M graphics card is better than the Quadro K2000 in our tests.

The Quadro K2000 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

In addition, the GeForce GT 750M has a slightly lower TDP at 50 W when compared to the Quadro K2000 at 51 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GT 750M over the Quadro K2000.