Quadro K1000M vs RTX A500 Laptop benchmarks
In our benchmarks, the RTX A500 Laptop beats the Quadro K1000M in gaming performance.
In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the RTX A500 Laptop is better than the Quadro K1000M.
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 2 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?
GPU Comparison
Quickly search and compare graphics cards
Benchmark Score
Overall Score
General gaming and workstation score
1923%
significantly better overall score
Flux Core frame rate
Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes
47 FPS
significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
Electron frame rate
Randomly generated noise sphere test
23 FPS
significantly higher Electron frame rate
City frame rate
Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering
32 FPS
significantly higher City frame rate
Clouds frame rate
Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test
16 FPS
significantly higher Clouds frame rate
Free GPU Benchmark
Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K1000M and the RTX A500 Laptop? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.
Other Benchmarks
Blender score
Cycles Render (Samples per minute)
3214%
significantly higher Blender score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
OpenCL compute benchmark
2250%
significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
Vulkan compute benchmark
2379%
significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
Specifications
Core Clock Speed
Nominal chip frequency
2%
slightly higher core clock speed
Memory Bus Width
Number of parallel lines to the memory chips
100%
significantly larger memory bus width
Memory Bandwidth
Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory
233%
significantly higher memory bandwidth
Pixel Rate
Number of pixels that can be rendered per second
1346%
significantly higher pixel rate
Texture Rate
Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second
623%
significantly higher texture rate
Shading Units
Number of processors dedicated to shader processing
966%
significantly more shading units
Texture Mapping Units
Number of processors dedicated to applying textures
300%
significantly more texture mapping units
Render Output Processors
Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering
100%
significantly more render output processors
Other details
Rank
Ranking in the hardwareDB database
506th
of 586
216th
of 586
Release date
The official date of release of this chip
2012 June
2022 March
Memory Type
The type of memory used by this chip
DDR3
GDDR6
DirectX Support
Maximum version of DirectX supported
11.0
12.0
OpenGL Support
Maximum version of OpenGL supported
4.5
4.6
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.