NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

Compare NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P400 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro P400

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 77.11

$ 67.36

$ 9.75 slightly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

158 points

343 points

117% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

5 FPS

7 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS

5 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

3 FPS

5 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS

4 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro 3000M and the Quadro P400? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

2894 points

5692 points

96% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3731 points

5614 points

50% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

450 MHz

1070 MHz

137% significantly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB

Identical

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

300% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80 GB/s

149% significantly higher memory bandwidth

32.06 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

30 W

150% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

4.5 Gigapixels/s

20.03 Gigapixels/s

345% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

18 Gigatexels/s

20.03 Gigatexels/s

11% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

240

256

6% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

150% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

462nd of 586

361st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro 3000M vs Quadro P400 specs and performance

For gaming, the Quadro P400 graphics card is better than the Quadro 3000M in our tests.

In our comparison, the Quadro P400 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

As stated by the manufacturer, they both have the same amount of memory at 2 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro P400 has a significantly lower TDP at 30 W when compared to the Quadro 3000M at 75 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro P400 over the Quadro 3000M.