NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 77.11
$ 82.10 significantly less expensive
$ 159.21

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

158 points
167 points
5% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

5 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate
4 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS
1 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
2 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

3 FPS
Identical
3 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS
2 FPS
0 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro 3000M and the Quadro K1100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

2894 points
28% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
2245 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3731 points
21% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
3067 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

450 MHz
716 MHz
59% significantly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB
Identical
2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80 GB/s
78% significantly higher memory bandwidth
44.8 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W
45 W
66% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

4.5 Gigapixels/s
5.65 Gigapixels/s
25% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

18 Gigatexels/s
22.59 Gigatexels/s
25% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

240
384
60% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

40
25% slightly more texture mapping units
32

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
100% significantly more render output processors
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

464th of 586
459th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

-
2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.5

Quadro 3000M vs Quadro K1100M specs and performance

For gaming, the Quadro K1100M graphics card is better than the Quadro 3000M in our tests.

In our comparison, the Quadro K1100M has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

As stated by the manufacturer, they both have the same amount of memory at 2 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Quadro K1100M has a significantly lower TDP at 45 W when compared to the Quadro 3000M at 75 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro K1100M is faster than the Quadro 3000M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons