NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Compare NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 88.11

$ 36.89 significantly less expensive

$ 125.00

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

167 points

974 points

483% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

4 FPS

21 FPS

17 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS

14 FPS

12 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

2 FPS

14 FPS

12 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

12 FPS

10 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro 2000M and the Quadro M2000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

2794 points

14953 points

435% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3434 points

14584 points

324% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

550 MHz

1180 MHz

114% significantly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB

4 GiB

100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

28.8 GB/s

105.8 GB/s

267% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

55 W

36% slightly lower TDP

75 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

4.4 Gigapixels/s

37.22 Gigapixels/s

745% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

17.6 Gigatexels/s

55.82 Gigatexels/s

217% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

192

768

300% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

49% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

459th of 586

266th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 April

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro 2000M vs Quadro M2000 benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro M2000 GPU is faster than the Quadro 2000M in gaming.

The Quadro M2000 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Quadro M2000 has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Quadro 2000M has a slightly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the Quadro M2000 at 75 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro M2000 over the Quadro 2000M.