NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

Compare NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K600 1 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K600

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 88.11

$ 82.77

$ 5.34 slightly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

167 points

156% significantly better overall score

65 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

4 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

2 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

1 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

2 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

1 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

0 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro 2000M and the Quadro K600? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

2794 points

77% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

1572 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3434 points

89% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

1810 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

550 MHz

876 MHz

59% significantly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB

100% significantly more memory

1 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

28.8 GB/s

1% slightly higher memory bandwidth

28.51 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

55 W

41 W

34% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

4.4 Gigapixels/s

25% slightly higher pixel rate

3.50 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

17.6 Gigatexels/s

25% slightly higher texture rate

14.02 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

192

Identical

192

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

455th of 586

535th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro 2000M vs Quadro K600 comparison

For gaming, the Quadro 2000M graphics card is better than the Quadro K600 in our tests.

The Quadro K600 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Quadro 2000M has significantly more memory with 2 GiB of memory compared to 1 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Quadro K600 has a slightly lower TDP at 41 W when compared to the Quadro 2000M at 55 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro 2000M is faster than the Quadro K600.