Intel Iris Xe vs Intel Arc A370M

Compare Intel Iris Xe vs Intel Arc A370M, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

974 points

1187 points

21% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

24 FPS

33 FPS

10 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

14 FPS

19 FPS

5 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

15 FPS

19 FPS

4 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS

12 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Xe and the Arc A370M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

169 points

3430 points

1929% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

100.90 points

328.16 points

225% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11957 points

29812 points

149% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

16575 points

28700 points

73% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

300 MHz

Identical

300 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1100 MHz

1550 MHz

40% slightly higher boost clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W

133% significantly lower TDP

35 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

13.2 Gigapixels/s

49.6 Gigapixels/s

275% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

26.4 Gigatexels/s

99.2 Gigatexels/s

275% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

8.45 TFLOPS

166% significantly better floating point performance

3.17 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

1024

166% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

166% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

166% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

264th of 586

251st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 September

2022 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

Iris Xe vs Arc A370M benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the Arc A370M beats the Iris Xe in gaming performance.

Our database shows that both the Iris Xe and Arc A370M both have the same core clock speed. Despite this, the Arc A370M has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the Iris Xe has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Arc A370M at 35 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Arc A370M is faster than the Iris Xe.